Drinking patterns, social interaction, and barroom behavior

October 1, 2006 at 1:13 am 4 comments

Two social scientists walk into a bar…

Typically, we read research papers for their educational value. However, I found this one to be more entertaining than educational.

Observations are done in two bars to explore victimization and guardian influence in bars. The two bars are referred to as “North Bar” and “South Bar”.

One bar which we have given the name, North Bar, attracted a more funky, laid-back weekend crowd that typically dressed in blue jeans, flannel shirts, sweatshirts, and sneakers.

The other bar which we have named, South Bar, attracted a larger and more diverse crowd reflecting a mixture of urban lifestyles, young professionals, college students, and more racial and ethnic minorities.

Here are some interesting excerpts from the paper:

Our observations of the interactions between female patrons and the bouncers revealed that the more flirtatious a female patron would be with the bouncers, the more likely she would be allowed entry into South Bar.

Bar patrons began streaming into the bars at approximately 10:00 p.m. On Tuesday nights the barroom capacity for South Bar was typically reached or exceeded by midnight, slowly continued to increase until approximately 1:30 a.m., and then gradually declined until approximately 2:30 a.m. After 3:00 a.m. only a small number of patrons, typically male heavy drinkers, remained in the bar.

Our observers overheard one exchange, short and to the point, “do you want some of this meat?” which was made while one of the men was rubbing his penis. In one instance a female patron left immediately with these men.

Two young men had begun the event during the late afternoon, were still drinking and were quite intoxicated when we arrived at 10:00 p.m. to begin our observations. They abandoned their efforts around midnight after consuming only about 30 of the required 40 glasses of beer.

Once a small group of males had initiated the formation of a gauntlet, others would join in until up to 20 to 30 men were in control of each side of the pathway for a considerable distance. When young women, typically those who were exceptionally attractive, would attempt to pass through this pathway, the males would first initiate a restriction of the pathway then freely grope, grab, or fondle selected females—typically on the buttocks or breasts.

Males seeking an “easy lay” frequently approached female patrons. On several occasions we observed female targets being quickly drawn into a conversation by a male patron, maneuvered into a seat at the bar, and presented with drinks. Within a short period of time the male would then begin moving his hand up the skirt of the target to her crotch area.

We observed that a higher percentage of female patrons during ladies’ night at South Bar were under the age of 21 years than those at North Bar. One of the South Bar observers was a police officer with substantial experience in estimating age. He agreed with the estimates provided by other observers that approximately 25–30 percent of all women in South Bar at peak drinking hours were under 21 years of age.

Small groups of male patrons would frequently attempt to attract the attention of females outside the bars by shouting across the street, and occasionally entering the street in traffic to get closer to those from whom they sought greater attention.

Males typically outnumbered females on Tuesday nights at North Bar by approximately 4 to 1, and approximately 3 to 1 at South Bar.

Fox, J. G. & Sobol, J. J. (2000). Drinking patterns, social interaction, and barroom behavior: a routine activities approach. Deviant Behavior, 21(5), 429-450.

Entry filed under: Alcohol, Barroom, Sociology.

When do you like someone like yourself? An analysis of online dating The Familiar Stranger: The Lady on the Subway

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Gwen  |  October 2, 2006 at 12:03 pm

    Conducting research in a bar and then reporting it in a distanced third-person? I’m in the wrong field….

    Also, I KNEW about that “gauntlet” phenomena, though in my experience, the men forming it more glare you down while checking you out than make overt physical contact.

  • 2. Audrey  |  October 11, 2006 at 12:37 pm

    I can’t believe this is a research paper! Great research. :)

  • 3. smart fashion buying house  |  July 28, 2017 at 11:06 pm

    Love the last bit about gaining their communcations via the “private” messaging system, I wonder what options were available for the participants to opt out …. probably buried in the T+Cs that the informatioin could be sold off.

    Having ranted above though, I am still reading through the results, some interesting information in there (assuming the data is accurate…we all know how people change small aspects of themselves for online dating). I find some of the graphically representions a bit questionable but I’m more a tables person. http://buyinghousewall.com/

  • 4. Arnob Endry  |  July 28, 2017 at 11:06 pm

    I wonder what options were available for the participants to opt out …. probably buried in the T+Cs that the informatioin could be sold off.Having ranted above though,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Read any good papers lately?

If you're interested in academic research, I'd love to have additional contributors. Shoot me an email.


%d bloggers like this: